Promotional Filler I: The Myth of Natural Rights and Other Essays

______________________________________

L.A. Rollins is an aphorist, or rather, an againstist. He is of the fraternity of those who deny both sides of every question, the refusniks who are always untimely. . . . For him, there isn’t a department of human experience that won’t sell you a bill of goods.

 – Bob Black, Beneath the Underground

 

061519298x_6

No, it won’t stop bullets. It won’t keep people from ripping off your property. It won’t even stop the government from putting you in a concentration camp, or executing you. About the only thing a “natural right” will stop is enlightened thinking on the ethics of liberty. Once you’ve read The Myth of Natural Rights and Other Essays, you’ll be able to put those imaginary protectors of freedom back in the museums where they belong.

Libertarian scholars have had a difficult time being taken seriously in intellectual circles. There’s a good reason for this. While they have gained recognition and acclaim for their staunch defense of the free market, compelling advocacy of civil liberties and devastating condemnation of interventionism, their stubborn reliance on the ancient myth of natural rights leaves them in philosophical disrepute. The doctrine of natural rights has persisted among libertarians, because there has never been a systematic and thorough critique of all it implies. Until now.

In one compact work, L.A. Rollins shatters the myth of natural rights, while exposing the “bleeding-heart libertarians” that promote it. With careful research and ample documentation, he shows that thinkers like Ayn Rand, Murray Rothbard, Tibor Machan and Samuel Konkin not only violate reason and logic in their defense of natural rights, but also violate the standards they set for themselves.

Back in print for the first time in years, this newly revised edition features an insightful introduction by the Stirnerite-libertarian upstart,TGGP, along with a new afterword by the author. Bonus material includes an updated selection of splenetic jeu de mots from the underground classic, Lucifer’s Lexicon, as well as Rollins’ never-before-published writings on poetic insurrection, the Holy Qur’an and Holocaust revisionism.

Caveat lector!

_____________________________________________________

Praise for The Myth of Natural Rights (Loompanics edition, 1983)

Rollins has made hash of the logical connections in Rothbard’s argument.

                – Robert Anton Wilson, Natural Law

An important book, which every reader interested in libertarian theory should acquire.

                – Jeff Riggenbach, author of In Praise of Decadence

Rollins does a fabulous job of making fools out of  many a libertarian’s
philosophical heroes.

                – Justin Weinberg, Guillotine

An argument could be made that a book like this is potentially pretty damn
dangerous.

                – Pat Hartman, Salon: A Journal of Aesthetics

Lou Rollins' brief work is packed with enough analytical insight to send proponents of natural law theory into hiding.

                 – Jorge Amador, The Pragmatist

_____________________________________________________

You can place an advance order through Amazon here. I'll be taking PayPal orders as soon as the Nine-Banded Books site redesign is ready for prime time, which shouldn't take much longer. To reserve an autographed copy, contact me.

Laden Rumors

  • Bradley Smith is banned from HNN. TGGP is banned from Econlog.  And The eXile is banned from Mother Russia.
  • Soon-to-be daddy Jim Goad has a "plum-sized" brain tumor carved out of his noggin and spends his recovery time pontificating on the finer points grammatical correctitude.
  • A new study breathes new life into the old theory that male homosexuality may be a byproduct of a  genetically-bound female horniness, er, I mean androphilic fecundity, or something. Meanwhile, Jack Malebranche yawns.

Mime More Not

Johnny Carson Rapes Child

Newspaper2_2

Gore Vidal's "Departure Lounge of Life"

From Robert Chalmer's interview in The Independent:

"But you're convinced that, to put it crudely, when you die, that's it." "No," Vidal replies. "I wouldn't say: 'When you die, that's it.' I'd say: 'When you're born, that's it.'"

UPDATE: From the 06/15 NYT Magazine:

Are you a supporter of gay marriage? I know nothing about it. I don’t follow that.

Why doesn’t it interest you? The same reason heterosexual marriage doesn’t seem to interest me.

If we look at the situation apart from you — It’s my interview, so we’ve got to stay with me.

Memento mori.

Jim Manzi 2.0

The article itself is only moderately interesting, but over at The American Scene, Jim Manzi's National Review cover story, Undetermined, has generated one of the most scintillating -- and admirably civil, despite Steve Sailer's arguably justified snarking -- discussion threads that I can recall reading in quite some time.  Comments are closed, but it's quite an artifact. (Thanks to TGGP for pointing it out.)

TangoMan provides a parting shot here

Memento mori 

Notes from a Short-order Cook

Jim Crawford of the antinatalism blog has added an autobiographical sketch to his right-margin and it's full of crazy surprises: 

I'm a 52 yr. old Caucasion male. I received what passes for a high school diploma in California. Worked full-time through my senior year. My father abandoned me and my four younger brothers right around graduation day, so I never really had much of a chance at procuring any fancy learnin' (not that I ever had much interest, anyhow...pot, hashish and acid were REALLY cheap back then!). Took a life detour through most of my twenties-joined a fundy-Christian cult, and became sort of an itinerant evangelist, before trashing the whole Jesus thang at 28. Married an African American woman (that lasted 25 yrs...about 7 in the middle were primo!) Had two daughters along the way. Did a lot of reading for a couple of decades, though not much from any prescribed or popular reading lists. Zen, quantum mechanics, astrophysics, some history and psych...that sort of thing. Oh, and scads of sci-fi and horror. Got divorced in '02...was actually a kept man up in Spokane, WA for a year and a half. After that fell through, I was homeless for a few months, until some drunk kids hit my truck at the stroke of midnight while I was sleeping in it. Chased them down, got a pittance of an insurance settlement which got me off the streets. Worked some minimum wage construction for a couple years, 'til my truck went south, then landed a gig as a minimum wage short-order cook at a fastfood Mexican restaurant, where I still work today. Renting a room at my ex-wife's to help her pay the mortgage. My current paramour (and hopefully last, for god's sake!) is a German woman living 2000 miles away in Houston. Saved up and bought a laptop last year. Lost my favorite cat of 14 years earlier this year, and it looks like I'll be losing my dearly beloved dog in the next couple of weeks or so (tumours, and after having spent every cent I had on surgery a few days before Xmas. It was totally worth it for the extra few months, but...well, life sucks). I still have two great kids, and a decent low-end bicycle (Trek), though 600 of my books have been sitting in boxes in a garage up in Spokane for the last 5 years...not much hope of ever seeing them again, which pretty much bites. I've come pretty close to dying 2 or 3 times, and have done a fair amount of dangerous work in my time, involving great heights and iffy equipment. Have contemplated suicide on a number of occasions (including most of the '90s, but never had the fortitude, you know?) Oh, and I wish I loved everybody, and sometimes I try to, though less these days. I guess that's about it. Oh yeah! I'm also a self-proclaimed, ersatz poet.

This is the first time I've ever offered a profile on any of my blogs or memberships. I thought I'd offer the lever of an unattractive psychological profile for any challengers to glom onto, since so far they don't seem to have much in the way of substantive disagreement to offer. This is NOT meant as an insult, btw, but please realize...

the subject of antinatalism is NOT a mere philosophical exercise for me. I'm not here to get my rocks off as a controversialist. Life sucks, and then you die, only...considering the risk that any given child might emerge into a world of personal horror, the trite little saying takes on a whole new depth of meaning for me. I hope it does for you, as well.

Sorry about the cat, Jim. I reckon I'll be inconsolable when the first of my seven checks out.

3.2g CARBS, 96 CALORIES, ALL NATURAL...

Due apologies for the less than substantial posting, good readers. I'm slumped over, trying to get the L.A. Rollins book in shape for the printer before the end of the month, struggling with InDesign quirks, smoking my pungent Latakia blend in a filterless bent pipe, and drinking Bukowskian quantities of cheap American beer. The day job is positively oppressive.

The good news is that the book has turned into a sumptuous behemoth; what started out as a moderately supplemented reprint of an obscure libertarian monograph has evolved into a genuine compendium, consisting of four "books" that collectively provide a nearly complete survey of the work of this forgotten zetetic recluse and equal-opportunity iconoclast, -- of this unclassifiable cornball-cum-dissident whose aphoristic spleen (on full display in Lucifer's Lexicon) made me laugh when I was enduring summer and night classes after flunking two years of high school English back whenever that was. Now, it seems hardly a day goes by that I don't receive another hand-addressed envelope in the box, stuffed with more Bierceian bombast from Herr Rollins, usually with a hand-written note politely expressing hope that the latest batch will make it in time. Lou isn't online, so everything he sends comes through the post, every word in longhand. And I'm a piss-poor transcriptionist, alas. Maybe I'm a prisoner to nostalgia, but it feels downright surreal, bringing these books -- this book -- to life, and I promise things haven't yet kicked into gear. You'll see, fuckers. Those of you foolish enough to care. Nine-Banded Books will conquer the universe. Texas is the reason that the president's dead.

I do mean to keep things afloat here, albeit for present purposes with these threadbare link-enhanced fixes. And I try to pay attention to the tubes, especially to those restless Adderall-scented truth-stalking fringes where quasi-kindred spirits take the lead. Jesus, those kids is scary-smart. Some of 'em, anyway. And I've been playing along as time permits -- over at that ever unpredictable stop where the guy whose name is a series of consonant letters keeps channel-surfing; over at that impossible-to-believe forum, where a proud father turned penitent antinatalist  plies his ambidextrous mindmeat to corner and refine the quixotically doomed case against breeding; over at that all-but-hidden nook where a self-described "(currently non-practicing) suicide" deftly connects the dismal dots. It's a strange congregation, says the suds. All this cerebral slumming that from a distance collapses into tristesse, or beerdrunk romance.

Permit me, then, this inelegant segue. To the obligatory filler. Cause baby there's no guide-ance when the random rules.

  • The inimitable J-Man heaps scorn on a hapless Girl Scout.
  • In a welcome respite from his tiresome Obama blogging,  Steve Sailer promises a careful dissection the the latest (conservative) argument against encroaching "geneticism." UPDATE: soup's up.

And finally, to close the circle, I want to point up this excellent dissident essay on the FLDS raid by my favorite "Catholic reactionary," Andy Nowicki, whose indescribably impolitic book,  Considering Suicide, will be published by Nine-Banded Books in 2009. Just you wait.

Memento mori.



         

Random Rules V

  • "How did the United States, the world's scientific powerhouse, reach a point at which it grapples with the ethical challenges of twenty-first-century biomedicine using Bible stories, Catholic doctrine, and woolly rabbinical allegory?" Steven Pinker has some ideas.
  • Ostensibly "about sex offenders and the art of photography," Peter Sotos' forthcoming book, Lordotics, promises to bring poor Lyndie England into the frame.  With Errol Morris's captivating apologies back on the festival circuit, white people may want to prioritize their attention carefully. At least Andrea Dworkin isn't around to complicate matters.   
  • Jim Crawford continues his exceptionally perceptive chapter-journal on David Benatar's Better Never to Have Been. You can catch up, here, here, here and here.
  • Twenty minutes into a radio interview with Holocaust revisionist Robert Faurisson, the French government's editorial ombudsman pulled the plug, apparently for fear of running afoul of France's Fabius-Gayssot law (or Gayssot law), which, like similar statutes across the globe, imposes criminal sanctions upon those who publicly contest "crimes against humanity" as defined by the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal of 1945-46. Courtesy of the stalwart racialist thought criminals at The Civic Platform, you can now read an English translation of the banned interview, in which Faurisson provides a scathing account of anti-denial laws without contesting one word of Nuremburg scripture.   

Here's another one from the abridged and updated Lexicon:

Zygote, n. - A human being, just like you and me. Hath not a zygote eyes? Hath not a zygote hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions? If you prick them, do they not bleed? If you tickle them, do they not laugh? And if you wrong them, shall they not revenge? 

Memento mori.

Rollins Teaser - "Lucifer's Lexicon" (updated)

UPDATED on 05/04/2008

In addition to the eponymous monograph, The Myth of Natural Rights and Other Essays will include a generous assortment of rare and never-before-published writings by L.A. Rollins, perhaps the most notable -- if not the most notorious -- being an "updated abridgment" of the underground classic, Lucifer's Lexicon.

Here follows a small selection of newly-minted nuggets for the craw:

Banquet, n. - 1. A sumptuous feast.  2. A presumptuous frozen dinner.

Dualism, n.
- Duelism.

Godfearing, adj. - Afraid of nothing.

Holocaust revisionist, n. - One who denies being a denier.

Hurricane, n. - An act of God, which proves that God is a terrorist, an evildoer who should be put down like a mad dog.

Islamofascist, n. - A Muslim follower of Mussolini.

Jesus Christ, n. - The sin of God.

Jungian, n. - One who is a Freud of his own shadow.

Koran, the, n. - A holy source of toilet paper, like The Bible, The Talmud,  The Book of Mormon, the Urantia book, etc.  The Koran is also useful for children's games of "kick the Koran."

L.D.S., n. -  A psychedelic drug more dangerous than L.S.D.

Legislation, n. - The poetry of power.

Liberal, n.
- One who believes a woman has the right to kill her fetus, but not with a gun.

Moral Compass, n. - A direction-detecting device used by American and Israeli pilots to find bombing targets. 

Mithras, n. - An ancient savior-god who stabbed the bull, as distinguished from Jesus, who shot it. 

Ombudsman, n. - A watchdog without teeth who works for the thief.

Our Troops, n. pl. - Our thugs and assassins. Of course, we all support our brave thugs and assassins, because we are all cowardly conformist cunts, aren't we?

Politically Correct, adj. - Intellectually crippled.

Satan, n. - The son, not the father, of lies.

Senseless Murder, n. - A murder that makes no sense, as distinguished from a sensible murder, the only kind of murder that a sensible person, wearing sensible shoes, would commit.

Solipsist, n. - 1. One who has only himself to blame. 2. One for whom masturbation is the only kind of sex possible.

Sour Grapes, n. pl. - Fruits, which when fermented, produce fine whines.

Suffer, v. - 1. To be human, according to Buddah. 2 To be a Jew, according to Judah.

Village, n. - What it takes to raise a village idiot.

Weapons of Mass Destruction, n. pl.  - The most dangerous weapons of all, so dangerous that they constitute an intolerable threat, even when they don't exist.

Work ethic, n.
- Slave morality.

Memento mori.

Random Rules IV

Elsewhere. . .

  • 4/22/08 Update: Jim Crawford, host of the essential Antinatalism blogkicks off a series of posts in which he promises to provide chapter-by-chapter commentary on David Benatar's maligned and misunderstood monograph, Better Never to Have Been.  If you have more than a passing interest in the multi-fanged case against breeding, you should know that Jim is also contributing several essays for the Hog-edited anthology, Against Life, Against Death, which will be released by Nine-Banded Books in 2009.         
  • Via Hit & Run comes news that John Stagliano, director of the seriously great (if unheralded) confessional documentary, Buttman Confidential, is being prosecuted for obscenity. You can follow the press links here, and you can contribute to his defense here.

Memento mori.

"A series of dreamlike vignettes"

The Lawnchair Philosopher posts a most thoughtful review of Bradley Smith's The Man Who Saw His Own Liver. An excerpt:

The writing style is at the same time sparse, and elegant. This is no dry accounting, but a work of poetic prose, rich in metaphor and emotional content. Each reminiscence stood alone for me; which might be a drawback to the reader expecting a more linearly styled memoir. Doubly so for those who don't like their diatribes leavened with subtlety, or self examination. Being the sort of fellow who likes to bury his head in the cat box at the mere mention of politics, extremist or otherwise, I was fairly taken aback upon delving into the author's 'infamous' political predilections (addressed by Chip Smith in the introduction). It made me glad that I read the book first; I still haven't ever read 'On The Road', and probably never will, because I made the mistake of reading the bios first, and can't get past the fact of Kerouac being a total ass-wipe. Now, instead of picturing Bradley Smith as some cartoonish Art Bell reject with a penchant for paranoid conspiracy theories, I'll always see him as a zen aspirant on his way to cracking that last koan. And how can you be mad at a guy who writes a line like this?...

I've always felt the urge to slip through desire, like an eel passing through nets cast out for bigger fish.

If you like great prose, written by a man just an epiphany or two short of emergence into a new, brilliant sphere, buy this book. There's an innocent clarity here, as well as a surprising sense of humanitarian compassion.

Another recent review characterizes Liver as having "the feel of Ludwig von Mises passed through the filter of, say, Errol Morris (or, in his artier stages, Roman Polanski)."

Curious? Order your copy here, here, herehere, or here. Autographed copies are available upon request through Nine-Banded Books.

Memento mori.

Coming Soon . . .

 The Myth of Natural Rights and Other Essays, by L.A. Rollins (With a new introduction by TGGP)

There's work to be done, but we're still shooting for a mid-summer release. Ordering information will be posted here and at Nine-Banded Books soon.   

Bear versus Hog

First off, I should mention that The Myth of Natural Rights and Other Essays is coming together, slow and sure. In the next few days, I expect to post the cover and will probably begin taking advance orders. I'm still shooting for a mid-summer release, but this may need to be pushed back as Mr. Rollins keeps  providing new material, much of which is too entertaining and ornery not to go in. The man is on a roll, and I mean to give readers their thirteen dollars worth.

Recently, I've been engaged in some polite discussion with the Christian conservative folks at The Bear Diaries over the spirit-depleting subject of antinatalism. In the first round, I jumped in to correct a common misconception linking David Benatar's ethical position with the more commonly encountered people-culling polemics of radical environmentalists. Soon after, I was joined by Jim Crawford, host of the singular Antinatalism blog, who proceeded to pollute the well with the usual counter-intuitive iterations. I chimed in to bat the pong and it went back and forth for a while, mostly to the snarkily professed amusement (and increasing irritation) of TBD habitués. The usual.

It must have jogged something, though, as it seems the eponymous Bear has since filed another antinatally-themed dispatch, this one banking off of Michael Cook's overconfident dismissal of the dismal (which the Hog previously banked off of here). Rather than using the occasion to point up the meretricious content of Benatar's thesis, however, the focus is trained more conveniently on the always available question of motive. Or more accurately, readers are asked to consider what environmental and nurtural factors might predispose a person to advance a particular view. "Did [David Benatar's] mother not hug him enough as a child?" Herr Bear thus inquires, further averring:

It is important in our analysis of ideas to reckon with their origin. If a given idea can be produced only by a certain kind of mind — well, that should be of especial significance.

While I would not dispute that from a certain vantage this reckoning may be of marginal curiosity, it is too easily employed as a deck-shifting tack, and ultimately as means to avoid engagement with an argument that reflexively evokes hostility or incredulity. Such misdirectional responses are parcel not merely to antinatalism, but to the disparate catalog of "dangerous ideas" that inevitably rouse the synapses of mild-mannered thought criminals like me, who cannot but make the mistake of asking the next question

When I read the work of those who question genocide, or who openly doubt that racial differences can be explained without reference to genetic factors, or who defend those hurtful  Ron Paul newsletters, I am wisely aware of the fact that such views may be more or less informed by extra-rational factors. Atheism may be a badge of conformity in certain rarefied cloisters. And for all I know, Kevin MacDonald's dissident Jewish studies may be animated by an abiding hatred of Judd Hirsch. There's simply no telling with these things. Suspicion may may be due, and trust is as reassuring as gossip.  But even an argument made in bad faith by an unhuggable motherless child may yet prove to be correct on the merits. And if the argument fails, it will always be possible to demonstrate why this is so without trotting out the couch.

Comments are open, if anyone cares. . 

Memento mori.      

Random Rules III

Elsewhere...

Memento mori.



   

Nine-Banded Update: Against Life, Against Death

This may be my last post for some time, as I really need to get the L.A. Rollins book ready for press and devote more energy to other Nine-Banded Books in the wings.

...Speaking of which, once The Myth of Natural Rights and Other Essays has topped the bestseller lists, the humble Hog's editorial attention will turn primarily to Against Life, Against Death, a collection of writings on antinatalism and related ideas that's currently slated for release in early 2009. Being just past the germinal phase, I can say that the book is shaping up nicely, with several contributors providing provocative chapter-essays on the personal and philosophical dimensions of Schopenhauer's orphaned nostrum. In addition to being the first non-scholarly treatment of a subject that has too hastily been dismissed as nihilistic, counter-intuitive, reductionist, apocalyptic, hostile, misanthropic, and, perhaps most conveniently, as the sad product of depressive ideation, Against Life will present the moral case against procreation in engagingly human terms. If David Benatar's important but academically-bound meta-ethical discursion provides a useful overview of the antinatalist position (and it does -- read it), my hope is that our anthology will serve as an accessible yet philosophically undeceived  underview -- a book that takes full account of the profound, and perhaps intractable, biases that lead decent and thoughtful people, often in this instance alone, to reify genetic interests in moral terms; a book that will not flinch before the implications of a strange and long-forbidden dialectic that pits eternal nothingness against the tempting language of parental agency, or against the ever-shifting formulations of some dismal short-sighted calculus.  If you believe the proposition that "no one should ever have children" to be preposterously untenable or simply mistaken, Against Life, Against Death, will beg you, earnestly and emphatically, to reconsider the stakes.

For more information, keep checking the soon-to-be redesigned Nine-Banded Books site.  And while you're there, please consider ordering a copy of Bradley Smith's  disarmingly poignant novella, The Man Who Saw His Own Liver.  Sales are slow, but the hipster clerks are slowly catching on

Memento mori.

Memento mori.

Memento mori.
   

One Person With Proof

Bradley Smith's latest experiment is premised on a deceptively simple question. These days, I'm told that Nazi gas chambers are passé, and that works like this, and this, and this, for all their meticulously phrased rational-empirical pretense, can be safely ignored or dismissed as the predictable fits of polished crankery one has to expect from misguided or ill-motivated brokers of such insidiously captious sophistry. Clearly, and despite every marrow-chilling detail I learned and believed as a child, there must be something flawed or even immoral about Bradley's stake in such old business. Mustn't there?  Surely, it would be gauche to take the bait. Better to leave the dirty work to these guys, who remind us that Bradley, the poor old fart, can't even spell.

With due regret, I am compelled to note that the The Hoover Hog's publishing imprint, Nine-Banded Books, has rather foolishly released Bradley Smith's novel, The Man Who Saw His Own Liver, which may be purchased by bad people and poor spellers through Atomic Books, Quimby's, Germ Books, and Amazon. Mae culpa.

Memento mori.    

Race-Baiting on the Brink of Apocalypse

As promised, here is another slightly revised and link-enhanced review-essay from the time-worn pages of the print incarnation of The Hoover Hog, which existed from 1996 to 1997. Touching as it does on the mid-nineties militia panic, it seems quaintly dated now. But we know how the pendulum swings. William Luther Pierce has been feeding the worms for half a decade now, but "The Fame of a Dead Man's Deeds" remains good fodder for racist and anti-racist alike.     

__________________________________________________


The first thing I saw in the moonlight was the placard with its legend in large, block letters: "I defiled my race." Above the placard leered the horribly bloated, purplish face of a young woman, her eyes wide open and bulging, her mouth agape. Finally, I could make out the thin, vertical line of rope disappearing into the branches above. Apparently, the rope had slipped a bit or the branch to which it was tied had sagged, until the woman's feet were resting on the pavement, giving the uncanny appearance of a corpse standing upright of its own volition.   

                                        -- "Andrew Macdonald," The Turner Diaries

In 1973, an erudite melanophobic Frenchman named Jean Raspail authored a patently racist novel that read like high literature. It was called Camp of the Saints, and it was received with measured praise from some important people. People like Sydney Hook and Max Lerner and James Kilpatrick.

Envisioning the impending arrival of a vast fleet of Ganges refugees ("The Last Chance Armada") to the naked shores of Mother France, Raspail's tale depicts the the chaos and implosive social declension that take root following the Armada's media-celebrated "peaceful invasion" of precious Western soil. In structure and tone and pace, Camp of the Saints has a certain undeniable resonance. It stands as a high-minded requiem, a tragically-framed exaltation of a fragile and glittery blood-willed occidental world in collapse.

Fascinating how the limn devolves, in calculated Boschian reels, to evoke perfect and specifically prurient chords of lizard-brain revulsion.  Toward the dark-skinned "other." In one rhapsodically salacious sequence depicting a free-for-all orgy aboard one of the refugee freighters, the flood gates are let open. 

. . . everywhere, a mass of hands and mouths, of phalluses and rumps.  Young boys passed from hand to hand. Young girls, barely ripe, lying together cheek to thigh, asleep in a languid maze of arms and legs, and flowing hair, waking to the silent play of  arms, and legs, and flowing hair, waking to the silent play of eager lips. . . Everywhere, rivers of sperm, streaming over bodies, oozing between breasts, and buttocks, and thighs, and lips, and fingers. Bodies together, not in twos, but in threes, in fours, whole families of flesh gripped in gentle frenzies and subtle raptures. Men with women, men with men, men with children, children with each other, their slender fingers playing eternal games of carnal pleasure.

Which, apparently, is just what we might expect from a heaping boatload of malnourished sand-niggers who "never found sex to be a sin."  One can only wonder whether Monsieur Raspail jerked off between sentences.

And one can only speculate about a more acutely atavistic -- yet comic -- penchant for fecal metaphor.  The self-imagined messiah of the Indian masses is affectionately dubbed "the turd eater," and our French scribe dwells, presumably without ironic intent, on the "the horrible stench" emanating from the fleet due to the refugees' resourceful practice of utilizing shit as fuel with which to cook their depleting rations of grain rice:

. . . the decks became weird workshops, where hands deft at molding this curious coal -- children, for the most part, down on their haunches -- took each new batch of turds, kneaded and shaped them, pressing out the liquid, and rolling them into little round briquettes, like the kind we used to burn in our stoves not very long ago. . . Other children, quick and clever, kept them supplied, eyes peeled for anyone, man or woman, poised in the humanoid fecal position. Zip! zip! there they were, hands flashing between two outspread thighs, grabbing the precious substance and trotting it off to the dung rollers while it was hot.

Yech.  The intent, I gather, might turn on making the foreigners seem, well, foreign.  When the enemy comes, he will smell like shit.  And he will be brown, like shit. Capisce?      

Anywise, this is one way of looking at things. But there are others.

In 1978, a paranoid Aspergery American writer named William Pierce authored a patently racist novel that read like downmarket smut.  It was called The Turner Diaries, and it was received with unequivocal condemnation among all the important people. At least those who deigned, invariably for transparently self-serving reasons, to notice it.

The Turner Diaries is clumsily written, preposterously plotted, and unremittingly psychotic in its  masturbatory portrayal of full-on violent caucasoid insurrection. Still I can't help but like it, if for no other reason than it's just about the meanest goddamn book ever written.

Following the passage of the ominous "Cohen Acts" of 1993, goes the story, the dreaded "equality police" set about large-scale confiscatory gun raids, thereby fomenting the formation of a covert paramilitary counteroffensive among a theretofore complacent aggregation of racially conscious white patriot-revolutionaries. Our hero and eponymous narrator is Earl Turner, a  nascent fanatic who, having seen the light, rises through the ranks of "The Organization," punctuating his ascent with schizophrenic flourishes of charmingly overwrought Hitleresque polemics.

Turner and his guerrilla compatriots start off small, blowing up central FBI headquarters in the nation's Judaically compromised capitol.  But the pyrotechnics amp up in short order, with the destruction of ZOG-controlled media establishments and with federal targets being picked off like lice.  Chaos ensues, and although the moribund enemy-government vainly returns fire, the bloated Zionist machine is no match for our intrepid team of firebrand Nordic warriors who make haste in launching a full-scale paramilitary takeover of California.

The Golden State provides the setting for the infamous "Day of the Rope," when bands of suspected race traitors are duly rounded up, beaten up, and strung up, all as the niggers, kikes, and chinks are "deported," shot and hanged as whim and circumstance dictate. Having somehow secured a modest arsenal of nuke-weaponry, the genocidal pranksters proceed to mount their penultimate offensive against The System by, naturally, blowing New York and Israel off the map. And with central command disabled, our man Turner has but to seal his  martyrdom, Kamikaze-style, in an air raid over the Pentagon.  In a fiery warrior's death, he secures a final tactical victory for The Organization, ensuring that future legions of race baitin' Jew hatin,' 14-word-recitin' milky white folk will inherit the  blood-ennobled task of instauration. So it is written.

Skip to the epilogue, where it is implausibly explained that, with a few minor and to-be-expected eruptions, the Organization continues apace and unabated in its racial conquests until the only impure nation remaining is China. To "stem the yellow tide," the industrious Aryan soldiers launch an all-out bio-chemo-nuclear attack over "16 million miles of the Earth's Surface, from the Ural Mountains to the Pacific and from the Arctic Ocean to the Indian Ocean."  And thus our tale ends happily with THE ANNIHILATION OF THE ENTIRE NON-WHITE WORLD.

What fun.

If I didn't know better, I'd swear the whole book was a hoax, concocted for the usual insipid reasons, à la Report From Iron Mountain or "Israel Cohen's" fabled playbook, A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century. It's all just so ridiculously lurid and contrived and gratuitous.

And stupid. For example. When Turner  looks into the prospect of recruiting Organization foot-soldiers from a none-too-promising throng of young "dropouts," he is disgusted to learn of the netherworldly existence of one "Kappy the Kike," a Jewish white slave merchant said to sell nubile runaway girls to "certain exclusive clubs in New York  where the wealthy go to satisfy strange and perverted appetites." But it gets better -- I mean, um, worse -- because a number of Kappy's hapless teenyboppers, "it is rumored, are eventually sold to a Satanist club where they are dismembered in gruesome rituals."

And there's that bit after the Cali-coup, when looting and social discord lead to drastic food shortages, and black  folk reflexively "lapse into cannibalism."  Or the part where a hyper-Semitic TV news anchor, after reporting on the Organization's nuke attack on "his beloved New York City" shed's the mask and falls into paroxysms of comicbook rage, chanting in Hebrew and pounding his chest. That's right, pounding his chest.

I could go on.  About the sanguinary excesses attending the Day of the Rope, where the author dwells ever-lewdly on the curious punishments endured by (usually white and female) race-mixers.  About how Hitler is cryptically and admiringly called  "The Great One."  About further adventures in hair-trigger Negro savagery.  And so on. There's never a dull moment, kids. But I think you get the point.  It reads like a bad joke.

Both Camp of the Saints and The Turner Diaries portray racial strife in decidedly apocalyptic terms, but whereas the former tome has fallen into relative obscurity, Pierce's pseudononymously penned hate fantasy never strays far from the news cycle.  This is due in large measure to the occasional  right-wing terrorist who whose criminal actions are, in media-speak, "linked" to the novel or its ever-peculiar author. In the 80s, it was the "Brotherhood of the Order," or something. More recently, it was suggested the book "inspired" Timothy McVeigh in his call to infamy.

While the high-profile headlines surely account for part of the banked fascination, I suspect there may be something more at work. At a bookstore where I once worked, we made a point of carrying The Turner Diaries from time to time, usually when it was in the news for whatever reason. What struck me was that with scant exception, those who purchased the book were rather obviously creatures of  Chomsky-benumbed leftist pedigree. And they would always -- always -- make a point of emphasizing their cultivated disapproving stance toward the book's unseemly content, usually couching their regrettable transaction with some fatuous "know thy enemy" explanation-excuse. Yes,  I see.  You're writing a paper, then?  All in keeping with the research.

Curiouser, one notices that career anti-racists like Morris Dees and Ken Stern are conspicuously animated by Pierce and his little red book.  And a goodly chunk of mainstream reporting on the over-hyped militia movement gravitates lazily toward Earl Turner's saga, lending the festivities a significance well beyond due. Displaying a keen awareness of the liberal meta-market, Lyle Stewart's Barricade Books stole the punchline by announcing that fully half of Turner-derived profits would go to some obnoxious anti-gun group. What up wit dat?

It's simple enough, really.  Just as The Turner Diaries plays into reactionary fantasies of race-warfaring insurgency, it also slakes the liberal need for demons. Whether through accident or ingenuity, Pierce's tome neatly affirms the unacknowledged prejudices of those who wish desperately to believe that NRA constituents are closeted tiny-dicked frothing racist villains whose desire to bear arms may be read as a kind of transferred holocaust-lust. It feeds the needs of Nazi and Nazi-hunter alike.

Is The Turner Diaries a "blueprint for tyranny" as some have suggested?  Is it a "Bible of Hate" as FBI busybodies sanctimoniously advise? Is it scary or or dangerous or evil? Nah.  It is at base a silly book. A cartoon, really. But one thing seems sure: if The Turner Diaries did not exist, it would be necessary for liberals to invent it.                                     

 

Random Rules II

Irascible bus-hopping expat, Fred Reed, shares some thoughts on the latest American Renaissance conference, where he was a somewhat unlikely speaker.  His take on the Phil Rushton goblin sounds about right to me:

One of the speakers was Phil Rushton, of the University of Western Ontario,     whose specialty is the study of racial differences in intelligence. Only among     the ideologically befogged is the subject beyond the pale. The evidence for     these differences would be voluminous if there weren’t so much of it.     Further, measurements of intelligence are reproducible and highly correlated     with success of both individuals and groups. The people who do these studies,     as for example Rushton, are highly intelligent themselves and cautious in     their conclusions.

It amuses me that such as Rushton are often regarded as right-wing racists,     drone. They point out that Jews are intellectually superior to other whites,     which is hardly a traditional right-wing view; and that East Asians are smarter     than whites, also not normally regarded as a white racist idea. Look at the     IQ hierarchy they find: Jews at the top, followed by, East Asians, whites,     South American mestizos, American blacks, African blacks. Now compare the     intellectual achievements of the groups. Kinda sorta fits, don’t it?     But we can’t talk about this because (a) we wouldn’t like the     results, and (b) because it takes an eighth-grade understanding of mathematics     to grasp a standard deviation, which eliminates most of the population.

I still have trouble with eighth-grade math, but that didn't stop me from sharing my thoughts on the subject of intractable race differences and Bell Curve bugaboos in a series of posts (here, here, and here) that more or less launched this here Hog thing.

More interesting is Fred's take on the demographic composition of the conference attendees:

The audience was anything but homogeneous. Someone who had been to various     such conventions said the crowd consisted of twenty percent Neo-Nazis and     twenty percent Jews. Jews, yes; Neo-Nazis, perhaps. If the latter means people     who want to exterminate this or that group, I encountered none. The closest     anyone came was an overwrought dingaling who, in question and answer, denounced     me as a race traitor for having married Violeta, my Mexican wife. I considered     an appropriate but anatomically unorthodox repositioning of my microphone.     However, the audience told him to sit down and shut up. Later a dozen people     apologized for his behavior, and I met a fair number of men who had Chinese,     Mexican, and Colombian wives. Race traitors all, I suppose.   

Two cheers for racialist gentility.

Elsewhere, the happily hetorodox Satanist cum Androphile polemicist, Jack Malebranche, channels Anton LaVey (channeling Ragnar Redbeard)  in "The Luxury of Empowerment," an undeceived meditation exposing the "epidemic confusion about the nature of power" while serving up a "pimp slap of cold, hard reality" to those who would seek safe refuge behind semantic soap bubbles. To wit:

"Empowerment" is a pathetic salve for low self-esteem, a comforting, ego-inflating illusion dreamed up by those who have little or no power but who covet a sense of vital importance. The illusion of "empowerment"  is prized by the powerless and humored by those who wield real power. The illusion of "empowerment" is a luxury, like cable television, air conditioning, imported gourmet food, chemical anti-depressants, plastic surgery, the "civil rights" lawsuit or anything else which is made possible only by the extreme wealth and military might of modern industrialized nations.

Elsewhere yet, looks as though there's a new antinatalist site on the grid.  It seems more targeted toward ever-impressionable young folk who might -- naturally -- contemplate breeding without having thought through the implications. Iterations being necessary, here's the entire opening salvo, more or less:   

You are going to die. I’m not telling you this to depress you. It’s just a simple fact…everybody dies. Everything living dies, period. Always. And along the way, we suffer. Oh, not all the time, and not equally. But suffering is part of what life is all about, and some people suffer horribly. Disease. Accident. Starvation. Abuse. And then, sooner or later, there comes death. To all of us. Always. Of course, we all know this, right? Right.

Still, we try to ignore the facts, and there are many ways in which we do this. Little games we play with ourselves and others. We invent magical beings who tell us what to do, and who promise to protect us. We imagine fairytale places to go to after we die, so it all won’t seem so bad. Of course, these are lies, but lies invented with the best of intentions; to make us less afraid. And then, there’s the biggest, and most harmful lie of all. We have children, imagining that we somehow live on through them…a kind of fake immortality. But make no mistake; our children, each and every one of them, will suffer and die, and no one will really live on at all. The only thing that lives on is the fear, and the story…the lie.

With modern birth control methods, nobody needs to have children anymore. The world is over-populated, but I’m not going to ask you to save the world. I’m simply asking you to save a child; your child. A child who is never brought into this world will never suffer, nor do harm, nor die. An unborn child will never fear, or lose anyone close to him. But, you might ask, doesn’t an unborn child also lose out on all the good stuff life has to offer?

Close your eyes. Now, imagine a little boy or girl in your head; any color or shape you choose. Now, open your eyes, and let the image fade. Did your imagined child lose out on anything? Of course not…he or she was an imaginary being, after all, and never existed even one little bit. The same goes for an unborn child; it never misses out on anything at all. However, a real child brought into the world can be made to suffer in all the ways you can imagine, and probably many ways you’d really rather not think about. Of course, any single child’s life might turn out relatively well, though everyone suffers somewhat. But are you really willing to take the chance that your child MIGHT be one of those who suffers terribly through life? Even if you think that chance is somewhat small? It’s a dice throw, after all. Why take the risk?

Of course, many people will pressure you throughout your childbearing years to ‘have kids’. That’s because of the pretend game I mentioned before; and also, because they want your kids to work, and pay taxes, and help to support them when they get old. If fact, until very recently in history, most people had children for this exact purpose, as many still do today. Oh, and in the past, lots of people owned or worked on farms, and every child was an extra hand to help do the chores. Children as farm tools…does that sound right to you? Well, anybody who tells you to have children, so that your children can contribute to the ‘future’, is basically saying the same thing. “Have a kid! You owe us!” Does anybody else find that idea upsetting?

If you really feel a need to have a child, adopt. There are plenty of already existing kids who need good homes. The world doesn’t need any more of them. Or volunteer somewhere; there are lots of organizations where you can help kids and adults get through life a little bit easier. I’m just trying to get the point across that there is absolutely NO need to have children, besides the obviously selfish ones. And that’s another thing- don’t let people accuse YOU of being selfish for refusing to breed. There is nothing more selfish than breeding, especially considering what a child might go through. And of course, no matter how good a particular child’s life is, in the end it must die. In a very real way, to have a child is also to condemn that child to death. Now, do you really want to do that?

Memento mori.

Bubble and Scrape

Been on the road and off the grid.  Semi-regular posting will resume as soon as I catch up on the non-required reading and tackle some long-procrastinated priorities.  For the moment, allow me to stray off topic and introduce you to the virtually unknown recordings of my good friend, Ugly Squab, whose self-styled brand of "Rest Stop Rock" once edged at the inconspicuous margins of a forgotten cassette mythos revolution.

Prone as I am to wallow in lugubrious lo-fi nostalgia, I will point out that I made up the words to "Toledo Birmingham" and "Eva Braun." I was living in a roach-infested studio apartment back then, sleeping on a painfully lumpy Murphy bed that took up most of my leased real estate. I was fat and poor and perpetually half-drunk. Just another shut-in, given to spiraling self-pity and pathetic crying spells.  I remember waking up one mid-afternoon and noticing I had developed a rather painful zit on my scrotum. Wincing, I popped it and sniffed the translucent product on my fingertips. Nothing.  Scrotum puss is odorless, I said aloud. To no one there. Not even the chair. I think I washed my hands.

Years later I landed a better job and moved into a garage apartment without the roaches. Then I quit eating meat and lost a ton of weight.  Then I rescued a sick little gray kitten from the pound and named him Boris. I would go to work and think about Boris and things seemed better. When I would come home, Boris would be there wanting to play fetch with plastic milk carton rings.  A perfect distraction. When Boris grew restless in his lonely days, the Ugly Squab let me adopt a sprightly little gray-and-white fucker from an unplanned litter.  I called him Jack. Jack the cat. Boris's conspirator. 

Then, late one night on the patio of a local dive bar, I find myself on a good wave and I offer to buy the quiet one a drink. She says yes and we talk about nothing and everything.  I forget to get her number, but after a few awkward calls to mutual acquaintances, I am put in touch.  Turns out, she's always up for Indian food.  Turns out, she's gone to good schools, where she studied Heidegger and film theory.  She's traveled the world, she has.  And she's in love with Lillian Gish. She has beautiful black-brown eyes and a quietly striking Jewish countenance. That I cannot forget.  I tell her I feel sorry for Hitler.  I tell her my favorite film is Straw Dogs.  And the first time she comes over to meet Jack and Boris, I hand her an open beer (of cheap American vintage) and I make a nervous and ill-advised Rohypnol joke. I might have told her about the scrotum puss, too. I should remember, but I don't. Yet somehow, she doesn't seem to mind.  I make her laugh. And she pretends to enjoy the cumen-infused couscous and portobello sandwiches that I have prepared.  After the first bite, she tells me I am "fun guy," and as usual I'm slow to get the pun.  I don't like puns. 

She must be crazy, my wife. My Eva Braun.  The only one who ever really knew me.  The one I love.  We have six cats now.  And Jack and Boris are doing fine.                     

Life is short. Beer is cheap.  Don't have children.  Free Sylvia Stolz.

Long Live Ugly Squab.

Memento mori.          

The Myth of Natural Rights and Other Essays

The kittens are restive, so I thought I'd go ahead and announce that Nine-Banded Books will soon release The Myth of Natural Rights and Other Essays, a meaty collection of shibboleth-smashing performance pieces by the reclusive libertarian iconoclast, L.A. Rollins.   

Originally published by Loompanics Unlimited in 1983, the central monograph is a two-fisted display of lib-targeted philosophical shit-stirring that holds up well after 25 years. In its previous incarnation, The Myth provoked a fair amount of measured praise along with entertaining fits of blustery outrage among libertarian stalwarts and natural law votaries, with much of the tooth-gnashing playing out in the pages of the  Sam Konkin's old New Libertarian magazine. Rollins' thesis also famously prompted movement luminary Murray Rothbard to pen a delightfully truculent head-in-the-sand essay enjoining "The Duty of Natural Outlaws to Shut Up," and it inspired Robert Anton Wilson to publish a lively book-length companion essay entitled Natural Law: Or Don't Put a Rubber on Your Willy.   

The Nine-Banded reprint will be padded with scads of  new material, including a duo of essays outlining Mr. Rollins' stigma-courting zetetic stance on Holocaust revisionism as well as a salubrious sampling of new and old satirical spleen in the spirit of Lucifer's Lexicon.  The post-paleo-libertarian-Stirnerite, TGGP, has also written a razor-sharp intro that brings the project into contemporary perspective while succinctly underscoring the timeless relevance of  Saint Max. It's going to be a cool book, kids.  We're still dressing things up, but one way or another, I expect to have The Myth to press by June, and I'll be sure post more detailed information here and at the 9BB site as the project develops.

Memento mori.

My Photo

Affiliated Sites

Arts & Letters